Intervention effectmodel-written summary

White-light irradiation significantly reduced coleoptile elongation after four hours.

A claim from Differential expression of two barley XET‐related genes during coleoptile growth · 2000

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

White-light irradiation significantly reduced coleoptile elongation after four hours.

Treatment
continuous white- light irradiatione0
Outcome
coleoptile elongatione0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
4 he0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“coleoptile elongation decreased significantly 4 h after the onset of a continuous white- light irradiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–971
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–37

Title

Differential expression of two barley XET‐related genes during coleoptile growth

Judith Burstin Journal of Experimental Botany 2000. doi:10.1093/jexbot/51.346.847

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-d520f522d36d9e43af81b68e1de949b4dd9bee1c7fecb5d10fd9f75b0dac5a71 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

radiation · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

36 papers: 13 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Irradiated coleoptiles had a growth pattern similar to normal ones.

    GROWTH OF THE BARLEY COLEOPTILE. I. ITS RELATIONSHIP TO CELL NUMBER AND LENGTH IN NORMAL AND γ‐IRRADIATED SEEDLINGS · 1972 · compared with normal ones

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    Low-dose seed irradiation increased barley root length.

    Early response of barley embryos to low‐ and high‐dose gamma irradiation of seeds triggers changes in the transcriptional profile and an increase in hydrogen peroxide content in seedlings · 2019

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Natural light produced the heaviest barley weight by day 15.

    The effect of photo-irradiation on the growth and ingredient composition of young green barley (Hordeum vulgare) · 2013

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Irradiation increased early barley growth.

    FACTORS CONTROLLING THE RESPONSE OF FIELD CROPS TO VERY LOW DOSES OF GAMMA IRRADIATION OF THE SEED · 1986

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Electron irradiation with a 7-day post-radiation period stimulated laboratory germination of barley seeds by 22–25% at doses of 1, 2, 4 and 5 kGy.

    Influence of electronic irradiation on the affection of barley by root rot · 2019

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    At 100 mM NaCl, 3 Gy irradiation increased barley seedling growth rate by 1.95% against control.

    Impact of Proton Beam Irradiation on the Growth and Biochemical Indexes of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Seedlings Grown under Salt Stress · 2020 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Gamma irradiation at 200 Gy significantly increased the final germination percentage of barley compared with no radiation.

    Gamma radiation influence on germination characteristics of barley · 2021 · compared with no radiation

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Growth was stimulated by weak irradiation doses (20 Gy) regardless of water content.

    Étude des variations de radiosensibilité des semences d'orge (Hordeum vulgare) en fonction de la teneur en eau · 1991

    Opposite direction

27 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

light · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 23 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Combined red, blue, far red and UV A light enhanced above ground biomass growth.

    Distinct Morphological, Physiological, and Biochemical Responses to Light Quality in Barley Leaves and Roots · 2019

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Light suppressed precocious germination of cultured barley embryos.

    Development of cultured barley embryos. II. Precocious germination and dormancy · 1972

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Increasing fluorescent light intensity increased barley floral development under both long and short photoperiods.

    Effects of Daylength and Light Intensity on Growth of Barley I. Growth and Development of Apex with a Fluorescent Light Source · 1963

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Chloroplasts in immature leaves grew and developed more thylakoids after transfer to darkness.

    Light‐independent accumulation of chlorophyll a and b and protochlorophyllide in green barley (Hordeum vulgare) · 1985 · compared with daylight

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Longer Stage II photoperiod increased leaf, stem, head development and fertility.

    THE INFLUENCE OF VARIETY, TEMPERATURE, AND STAGE OF GROWTH ON THE RESPONSE OF SPRING BARLEY TO PHOTOPERIOD · 1960

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Four weeks of darkness during callus formation enhanced shoot regeneration in cultivar K-3 of barley.

    Light control of shoot regeneration in callus cultures derived from barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) immature embryos · 2008

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Natural light produced the heaviest barley weight by day 15.

    The effect of photo-irradiation on the growth and ingredient composition of young green barley (Hordeum vulgare) · 2013

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Barley under 12-hour photoperiod showed more dry weight.

    Effect of Photoperiod and Temperature on Development of Barley · 1941

    Opposite direction

28 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.