Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Potassium silicate spray gave Brix of 21.87 compared with untreated control.

A claim from Effect of Silicon Fertilizers on Management of Brown Spot Disease of Sugarcane under Natural Field Conditions · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium silicate spray gave Brix of 21.87 compared with untreated control.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
foliar spray of Potassium silicate @ 0.5% at 120 and 150 DAPe0
Outcome
Brixe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
21.87e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Among the treatments, foliar spray of Potassium silicate @ 0.5% at 120 and 150 DAP was found significantly superior and the most effective for the control of brown spot disease of sugarcane as compared to the rest of the treatments and recorded minimum per cent disease intensity (6.82%) and highest 82.45 per cent disease control , highest number of internode length (23.23cm), cane girth (12.15 cm), No. of internodes (21.92/cane), single cane weight (2.14 kg), NMC (88,890/ha), CCS yield (21.96 t/ha), cane yield (147.50 t/ha), CCS% (14.89%), Brix (21.87), Purity (95.21%) and sucrose content (21.12%), respectively as compared to untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–1461
t0

“Brown Spot Disease of Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–78
e1

“caused by Cercospora longipes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–464

Title

Effect of Silicon Fertilizers on Management of Brown Spot Disease of Sugarcane under Natural Field Conditions

Mulik S. P.; Nalawade S. V.; Deshmukh S. U.; et al. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports 2024. doi:10.9734/jsrr/2024/v30i122706

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-d56eeb255074c7d22c483460275b9cada61c7c9bb8adc3114382ed839e2c9bfb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer

silicate(4-) · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

potassium · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

25 papers: 25 positive, 0 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.