Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Soil potassium application did not significantly affect sugar yield or sucrose % in plant cane, 1st and 2nd ratoons.

A claim from RESPONSE OF SUGARCANE TO FOLIAR AND SOIL APPLICATION OF POTASSIUM FERTILIZER · 2000

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil potassium application did not significantly affect sugar yield or sucrose % in plant cane, 1st and 2nd ratoons.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
plant cane, 1st and 2nd ratoonse2
Treatment
K-levels as soil applicatione2
Outcome
sugar yield and sucrose %e2
Direction
not significantly affectede2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

t0

“RESPONSE OF SUGARCANE TO FOLIAR AND SOIL APPLICATION OF POTASSIUM FERTILIZER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76
e2

“sugar yield and sucrose % were not significantly affected by K-levels as soil application in the plant cane, 1st and 2nd ratoons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1339

Title

RESPONSE OF SUGARCANE TO FOLIAR AND SOIL APPLICATION OF POTASSIUM FERTILIZER

FAROK A. ABDEL-LATIF; AHMED M. A. ISMAIL Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research 2000. doi:10.21608/ejar.2000.322689

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-d7be4ff15c6fbede8ebff7f62995a9a0506ee2b4d9e3a0785db8b7c39f832114 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

potassium · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

25 papers: 25 positive, 0 negative or no effect

24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.