Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Septoria was more severe in 1975 and unaffected by fungicide.

A claim from Spring top-dressings of ‘Nitro-Chalk’ and late sprays of a liquid N-fertilizer and a broad spectrum fungicide for consecutive crops of winter wheat at Saxmundham, Suffolk · 1978

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Septoria was more severe in 1975 and unaffected by fungicide.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
fungicidee0
Interactor
S. nodorumParastagonospora nodorume1pathogen
Outcome
Septoriae1
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Parastagonospora nodorum
Parastagonospora nodorum · InteractorM. Fernandez-Gamarra, L. Talavera-Stefani, Y. Mongelos-Franco, C. Burgos-Cantoni, A. Sanabria-Velazquez, G. Caballero-Mairesse, P. Chavez, M. Vargas, R. Scholz, · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was much more severe in 1975, but was unaffected by the fungicide perhaps because this was applied too late”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–690
e1

“Septoria (S. nodorum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–524
e2

“winter wheat given”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–237

Title

Spring top-dressings of ‘Nitro-Chalk’ and late sprays of a liquid N-fertilizer and a broad spectrum fungicide for consecutive crops of winter wheat at Saxmundham, Suffolk

A. Penny; F. V. Widdowson; J. F. Jenkyn The Journal of Agricultural Science 1978. doi:10.1017/s0021859600056021

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-d5aa449d2589124c72374d657f1b6f0ec7edcb108b199461fd4b3fa64b401812 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

fungicide · Parastagonospora nodorum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.