Paper · 1981 · EPPO Bulletin

Effect of Fungicides on Septoria nodorum and Wheat Green Leaf Area1

V.W.L. JORDAN

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Fungicides applied at different growth stages were compared for the control of wheat glume blotch, caused by Septoria nodorum (Berk.) Berk. In glasshouse and small‐scale field tests, 11 commercially used fungicides, when applied to fully emerged wheat ears, cv. Hobbit, gave only partial control of ear infection by spores applied immediately after spraying. They gave better control of infection of leaves by a similar inoculum. Larger field trials, moreover, indicated better foliar and ear disease control from fungicide applications made before ear emergence, compared with those applied later. In another field trial, nine fungicides were applied to replicated plots of winter wheat, cultivars Atou and Hobbit at GS 31, GS 39, GS 55 or GS 71. On five occasions from anthesis (25 June) until 30 July disease was assessed and green leaf area measured. The trial was harvested on 22 August 1980. Significantly greater yields and grain weights were obtained from plots sprayed with fungicide at GS 39 than from those sprayed at any other time or left unsprayed. Treatments made before symptoms of infection by S. nodorum developed (i.e. before GS 55) prolonged the duration of green leaf areas during the post‐anthesis period. Grain weight and yield increases were related closely to the duration of green leaf area above 75 96, but not to the amount of green leaf area at any single assessment nor to the subsequent degree of disease development. The data on which this abstract is based form part of a continuing research programme, the results of which will be published in full at a later date. Full details on the 1980 results referred to above appear in the Annual Report of Long Ashton Research Station (1980).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In field trials, fungicide applications made before ear emergence gave better foliar and ear disease control of wheat than later applications.

Treatment
fungicide applications made before ear emergencee1
Interactor
Septoria nodorumParastagonospora nodorume0pathogen
Outcome
foliar and ear disease controle1
Direction
bettere1
Comparator
those applied latere1
Setting
field trialse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Parastagonospora nodorum
Parastagonospora nodorum · InteractorM. Fernandez-Gamarra, L. Talavera-Stefani, Y. Mongelos-Franco, C. Burgos-Cantoni, A. Sanabria-Velazquez, G. Caballero-Mairesse, P. Chavez, M. Vargas, R. Scholz, · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Green Leaf Area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“wheat glume blotch, caused by Septoria nodorum (Berk.) Berk.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–139 · show in text ↑
e1

“Larger field trials, moreover, indicated better foliar and ear disease control from fungicide applications made before ear emergence, compared with those applied later”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–597 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eleven fungicides applied to fully emerged wheat ears gave only partial control of ear infection.

Material
cv. Hobbite2
Treatment
when applied to fully emerged wheat earse2
Outcome
control of ear infectione2
Qualifier
only partiale2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Green Leaf Area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–66 · show in text ↑
e2

“11 commercially used fungicides, when applied to fully emerged wheat ears, cv. Hobbit, gave only partial control of ear infection by spores applied immediately after spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–357 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicides applied to fully emerged wheat ears gave better control of leaf infection than of ear infection.

Treatment
when applied to fully emerged wheat earse2
Outcome
control of infection of leavese3
Direction
bettere3
Comparator
ear infectione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Green Leaf Area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–66 · show in text ↑
e2

“11 commercially used fungicides, when applied to fully emerged wheat ears, cv. Hobbit, gave only partial control of ear infection by spores applied immediately after spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–357 · show in text ↑
e3

“They gave better control of infection of leaves by a similar inoculum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–428 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide at GS 39 gave significantly greater yields and grain weights than other timings or no fungicide.

Treatment
sprayed with fungicide at GS 39e4
Outcome
yields and grain weightse4
Direction
greatere4
Comparator
those sprayed at any other time or left unsprayede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Green Leaf Area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–66 · show in text ↑
e4

“Significantly greater yields and grain weights were obtained from plots sprayed with fungicide at GS 39 than from those sprayed at any other time or left unsprayed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1061 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide treatments made before S. nodorum symptoms developed prolonged the duration of green leaf area in wheat.

Treatment
Treatments made before symptoms of infection by S. nodorum developede5
Interactor
S. nodorumParastagonospora nodorume5pathogen
Outcome
duration of green leaf arease5
Direction
prolongede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Parastagonospora nodorum
Parastagonospora nodorum · InteractorM. Fernandez-Gamarra, L. Talavera-Stefani, Y. Mongelos-Franco, C. Burgos-Cantoni, A. Sanabria-Velazquez, G. Caballero-Mairesse, P. Chavez, M. Vargas, R. Scholz, · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Green Leaf Area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–66 · show in text ↑
e5

“Treatments made before symptoms of infection by S. nodorum developed (i.e. before GS 55) prolonged the duration of green leaf areas during the post‐anthesis period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1226 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain weight and yield increases in wheat were closely related to the duration of green leaf area above 75 96.

Organ / stage
green leaf areae6
Outcome
Grain weight and yield increasese6
Qualifier
duration of green leaf area above 75 96e6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Green Leaf Area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–66 · show in text ↑
e6

“Grain weight and yield increases were related closely to the duration of green leaf area above 75 96, but not to the amount of green leaf area at any single assessment nor to the subsequent degree of disease development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1447 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain weight and yield increases in wheat were not related to the amount of green leaf area at any single assessment.

Organ / stage
green leaf areae6
Outcome
Grain weight and yield increasese6
Qualifier
the amount of green leaf area at any single assessmente6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Green Leaf Area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–66 · show in text ↑
e6

“Grain weight and yield increases were related closely to the duration of green leaf area above 75 96, but not to the amount of green leaf area at any single assessment nor to the subsequent degree of disease development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1447 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain weight and yield increases in wheat were not related to the subsequent degree of Septoria nodorum disease development.

Interactor
Septoria nodorumParastagonospora nodorume0pathogen
Outcome
Grain weight and yield increasese6
Qualifier
the subsequent degree of disease developmente6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Parastagonospora nodorum
Parastagonospora nodorum · InteractorM. Fernandez-Gamarra, L. Talavera-Stefani, Y. Mongelos-Franco, C. Burgos-Cantoni, A. Sanabria-Velazquez, G. Caballero-Mairesse, P. Chavez, M. Vargas, R. Scholz, · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Green Leaf Area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“wheat glume blotch, caused by Septoria nodorum (Berk.) Berk.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–139 · show in text ↑
e6

“Grain weight and yield increases were related closely to the duration of green leaf area above 75 96, but not to the amount of green leaf area at any single assessment nor to the subsequent degree of disease development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1447 · show in text ↑

fungicide · Parastagonospora nodorum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fungicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 232 positive, 30 negative or no effect

231 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.