Claim · model-written summary
Plant 15N recovery rates were greater in the I540 irrigation treatments than in the I405 treatments.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- I540 treatmentse0
- Outcome
- Plant 15N recovery ratese0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- I405 treatmentse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Plant 15N recovery rates were greater (i) in the I540 treatments than in the I405 treatments”
t0“Cotton growth”
Title
Wei Min; Huijuan Guo; Zhiqiang Hu; et al. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Soil & Plant Science 2017. doi:10.1080/09064710.2017.1338309
Other claims from this paper (16)
- Intervention effect Cotton biomass, N uptake and yield increased as irrigation amount increased.
- Intervention effect Cotton biomass, N uptake and yield increased as N amount increased.
- Intervention effect Cotton biomass, N uptake and yield were significantly less with saline water (SW) than with fresh water (FW) and brackish water (BW).
- Intervention effect Plant 15N recovery rates were greater in the N360 treatments than in the N240 treatments.
- Intervention effect Plant 15N recovery rates in brackish water (BW) were 7.98% greater than in fresh water (FW).
- Intervention effect Plant 15N recovery rates in brackish water (BW) were 30.01% greater than in saline water (SW).
- Intervention effect Residual soil 15N increased as N fertilizer amount increased.
- Intervention effect Residual soil 15N declined as irrigation amount increased.
- Intervention effect Residual soil 15N in brackish water (BW) treatments was 6.02% greater than in fresh water (FW).
- Intervention effect Residual soil 15N in saline water (SW) treatments was 21.44% greater than in fresh water (FW).
- Intervention effect Total 15N recovery was significantly greater in brackish water (BW) than in fresh water (FW) and saline water (SW).
- Intervention effect 15N leaching losses increased significantly with increases in irrigation amount.
- Intervention effect 15N leaching losses increased significantly with increases in irrigation water salinity.
- Intervention effect 15N leaching losses increased significantly with increases in N rate.
- Intervention effect The authors suggest that, with appropriate amounts of irrigation water and N fertilizer, brackish irrigation water (4.61 dS/m) will not affect cotton growth, yield and N recovery.
- Intervention effect The authors conclude that saline irrigation water (EC > 8 dS/m) reduces cotton growth, yield and N use efficiency.