Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fertilization did not influence faba bean nitrogen and phosphorus uptake.

A claim from Effects of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilizers and Intercropping on Uptake of Nitrogen and Phosphorus by Wheat, Maize, and Faba Bean · 2003

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization did not influence faba bean nitrogen and phosphorus uptake.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
fertilizatione0
Outcome
N and P uptakee0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both fertilization and intercropping did not influence the N and P uptake by faba bean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1274

Title

Effects of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilizers and Intercropping on Uptake of Nitrogen and Phosphorus by Wheat, Maize, and Faba Bean

Wenxue Li; Long Li; Jianhao Sun; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2003. doi:10.1081/pln-120017670

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-d6888fbb6fe0b2aaa5a0d4d761887c9b8e6797ed0d5934dd9fcb14953c0e3b4a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

fertilization · nutrient: content · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 54 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 54 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.