Intervention effectmodel-written summary

GA3 at 50 ppm gave a significantly higher tomato yield (103.46 metric ton/ha) than GA3 at 0, 25 and 75 ppm.

A claim from Effect of GA3 and NAA on tomato production under protected cultivation in Kaski, Nepal · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 50 ppm gave a significantly higher tomato yield (103.46 metric ton/ha) than GA3 at 0, 25 and 75 ppm.

Treatment
GA3 @ 50 ppme1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
103.46metric ton ha-1e1
Comparator
GA3 @ 0 ppm, GA3 @ 25 ppm and GA3 @ 75 ppme1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“a significantly higher yield (103.46metric ton ha-1) of tomato was attained with GA3 @ 50 ppm and it was 13.91%, 10.31% and 6.74% higher over GA3 @ 0 ppm, GA3 @ 25 ppm and GA3 @ 75 ppm, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–1062

Title

Effect of GA3 and NAA on tomato production under protected cultivation in Kaski, Nepal

Ritesh Kumar Jha; Rabin Thapa; Arjun Kumar Shrestha Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 2022. doi:10.1016/j.jafr.2022.100450

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-d69f430e09a3d7a3e4e885095f6d09da079cbbbfe454743071a5638abba50863 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Gibberellic acid · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

56 papers: 51 positive, 5 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

47 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.