Claim · model-written summary
Removal of Rubus stems had no significant effect on fir seedling shoot growth over one season.
- Taxon
- Fraser Fir Seedlingst0
- Treatment
- Remova l of Rubus s temse0
- Outcome
- fir seedling shoot growthe0
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Remova l of Rubus s tems produced no signif icant effect on fir seedling shoot growth over one season”
t0“Fraser Fir Seedlings”
Title
Does Rubus canadensis Interfere with the Growth of Fraser Fir Seedlings
Eric F. Pauley 1989
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Observation Rubus canadensis density was highest on the southwest-facing slope.
- Observation Fraser fir seedling density was highest on the northeast-facing slope.
- Association Rubus density and Fraser fir seedling density were positively rank-correlated (Spearman 0.376, P < 0.01).
- Association In most years terminal shoot growth of fir seedlings was positively associated with Rubus density (coefficients 0.309 to 0.396, P < 0.01).
- Association Rubus density and biomass were significantly correlated with soil phosphorus and potassium concentrations.
- Association In all measured years, terminal shoot growth of fir seedlings was positively associated with soil pH and potassium concentration.
- Observation Only 38% of the fir seedlings were younger than 5 years.
- Observation More fir seedlings than expected occupied dead wood substrates.
- Observation More than 25% of seedlings showed adelgid damage.
- Observation Most seedlings showed a trend of increasing gains in terminal shoot growth over previous years.
- Observation Rubus responded to stem removal by rapid appearance and growth of new stems.
- Intervention effect Large seasonal changes in bryophyte cover and red spruce seedling density occurred and were not affected by Rubus removal.
- Association Fir shoot growth does not appear to be associated with Rubus density or biomass.