Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Priming gave a 13% grain yield advantage in marginal Indian areas.

A claim from PARTICIPATORY EVALUATION BY FARMERS OF ON-FARM SEED PRIMING IN WHEAT IN INDIA, NEPAL AND PAKISTAN · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming gave a 13% grain yield advantage in marginal Indian areas.

Treatment
seed priminge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
advantagee0
Value
13%e0
Setting
Bihar and West Bengal states of Indiae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In forty-one trials in tribal areas of Bihar and West Bengal states of India, seed priming gave a 13% grain yield advantage for farmers growing wheat in marginal areas with low levels of agricultural inputs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–748

Title

PARTICIPATORY EVALUATION BY FARMERS OF ON-FARM SEED PRIMING IN WHEAT IN INDIA, NEPAL AND PAKISTAN

D. Harris; B. S. Raghuwanshi; J. S. Gangwar; et al. Experimental Agriculture 2001. doi:10.1017/s0014479701003106

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-da0d7527b7be9be998bc8b4321c39694ddbc0cc645df9a99646ad7a85ab050d7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

seed treatment · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

301 papers: 270 positive, 31 negative or no effect

269 papers in the same direction as this claim · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

292 papers more in this group

See all 301 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.