Claim · model-written summary
Foliar silicon concentration did not differ significantly between water and potassium silicate sprays.
- Treatment
- PSe0
- Outcome
- foliar Si concentratione0
- Direction
- no significant differencee0
- Value
- 0.30 dag kg −1e0
- Qualifier
- 0.24e0
- Comparator
- watere0
CoffeaNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The foliar Si concentration for plants sprayed with water and PS has no significant difference (0.24 and 0.30 dag kg −1 , respectively).”
t0“coffee”
Title
Effect of foliar‐applied potassium silicate on coffee leaf infection by Hemileia vastatrix
V. Carré‐Missio; F.A. Rodrigues; D.A. Schurt; et al. Annals of Applied Biology 2014. doi:10.1111/aab.12109
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Intervention effect Potassium silicate increased Si deposition on coffee leaves versus water.
- Intervention effect Rust severity reached 32% with potassium silicate versus 44% with water at 36 days after inoculation.
- Intervention effect Polymerised potassium silicate plates appeared on treated leaf surfaces and were absent with water.
- Intervention effect Water sprayed leaves had more uredia than potassium silicate sprayed leaves at 36 days.
- Intervention effect Potassium silicate treated leaves had less fungal colonisation than water sprayed leaves.
- Mechanism The authors suggest a physical role for polymerised potassium silicate, an osmotic effect on urediniospore germination, or both.