Claim · model-written summary
Copper alone did not change the measured water status, oxidative and hormonal indicators relative to controls.
- Treatment
- Copper treatments alonee0
- Outcome
- stomatal conductance, relative water content, malondialdehydee0
- Direction
- did not changee0
- Comparator
- control groupse0
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Copper treatments alone did not change stomatal conductance, relative water content, malondialdehyde, proline, hydrogen peroxide content and abscisic acid level according to control groups.”
t0“Maize (Zea mays L.)”
Title
Hatice CETINKAYA; Burcu SECKIN DINLER; Eda TASCI Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 2014. doi:10.15835/nbha4229632
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect Copper alone did not change proline, hydrogen peroxide or abscisic acid levels relative to controls.
- Intervention effect Combined copper and drought treatment alleviated drought damage in maize leaves.
- Intervention effect Drought increased SOD, CAT and GR activities in the tolerant cultivar.
- Intervention effect Drought decreased GST activity in the tolerant cultivar.
- Intervention effect Drought did not change APX activity in the tolerant cultivar.
- Observation Drought decreased SOD, CAT and APX activities in Shemal.
- Observation Drought increased GST activity in Shemal.
- Observation Drought did not change GR activity in Shemal.
- Intervention effect Copper alone increased SOD, APX and CAT activity in both maize cultivars.
- Intervention effect Combined treatment increased SOD, APX and CAT activity at all copper concentrations.
- Intervention effect In sensitive maize, PEG plus 1.5 mM copper increased GR and GST activity relative to PEG alone.