Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Teflubenzuron had an LC50 of 0.18 ppm against fall armyworm larvae.

A claim from Effectiveness of Teflubenzuron, Emamectin benzoate, and Alfa-cypermethrin on Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E Smith) (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera), under Laboratory and Field Conditions · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Teflubenzuron had an LC50 of 0.18 ppm against fall armyworm larvae.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
Teflubenzurone0
Interactor
S. frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdae0pest
Outcome
LC50 valuese0
Value
0.18 ppme0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that the LC50 values obtained were 0.18 ppm, 0.019 mg/ml, and 0.6046 mg/ml for S. frugiperda larvae treated with different concentrations of Teflubenzuron, Emamectin benzoate and α-cypermethrin respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–641
e2

“pest in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–108

Title

Effectiveness of Teflubenzuron, Emamectin benzoate, and Alfa-cypermethrin on Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E Smith) (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera), under Laboratory and Field Conditions

Nashwa, Amein; Aziza, Abdelal Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences 2023. doi:10.21608/eajbsa.2023.290568

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-da9564c2da52d45e92d41967fbdad5330035e1b4c42fbf7bdee5840ceb659ee3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

teflubenzuron · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.