Paper · 2014 · Americanae (AECID Library)

Inseticidas químicos e microbianos no controle da lagarta-do-cartucho na fase inicial da cultura do milho

Martins, Gustavo Mamore; Toscano, Luciana Claudia; Tomquelski, Germison Vital; et al.

2
claims
6
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

The objective this work was to evaluate the effect of microbial and chemical insecticides on the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda in the development initial phase of crop corn. The work was lead in the experimental area of the State University of Mato Grosso do sul, in Cassilandia (MS) city. The treatments had been: 1) control; 2) fipronil; 3) thiametoxan; 4) Beauveria bassiana (0,5 kg of p.c/ha), 5) Beauveria bassiana (1 kg of p.c/ha), 6) teflubenzuron and 7) spinosad, in the doses and recommended way of application. After the tenth second after the emergency of the plants (DAE), had been day applied the treatments in foliar spraying (PF), being evaluated to the 2, 9, 15 and 21 days after the application (DAA), the number of small caterpillars (lesser that 1,5 cm) for parcel in 20 showed plants. The applied results show that teflubenzuron and spinosad in PF to the 12 DAE had been most efficient (71 and 83% respectively). The microbial's insecticides had not differed significantly from the chemical insecticides in the percentage of plants attacked for the pest and the 15 and 21 DAA.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Teflubenzuron and spinosad applied by foliar spraying at 12 DAE were the most efficient treatments, with 71 and 83% efficiency.

Treatment
teflubenzuron and spinosade1
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdae3pest
Outcome
number of small caterpillarse2
Direction
most efficiente1
Value
71 and 83%e1
Setting
Cassilandia (MS)e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“teflubenzuron and spinosad in PF to the 12 DAE had been most efficient (71 and 83% respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–937 · show in text ↑
e2

“the number of small caterpillars (lesser that 1,5 cm) for parcel in 20 showed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–809 · show in text ↑
e3

“evaluate the effect of microbial and chemical insecticides on the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda in the development initial phase of crop corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–178 · show in text ↑
e4

“in Cassilandia (MS) city”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–294 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial insecticides did not differ significantly from chemical insecticides in the percentage of corn plants attacked by the pest.

Treatment
microbial's insecticidese1
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdae2pest
Outcome
percentage of plants attackede1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Comparator
chemical insecticidese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The microbial's insecticides had not differed significantly from the chemical insecticides in the percentage of plants attacked for the pest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1079 · show in text ↑
e2

“evaluate the effect of microbial and chemical insecticides on the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda in the development initial phase of crop corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–178 · show in text ↑

teflubenzuron · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

spinosad · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

26 papers: 26 positive, 0 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

insecticide · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 30 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.