Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Barley sowing at 100, 150, and 200 kg/ha reduced tall fescue reproductive tiller numbers by an average of 145/m 2.

A claim from Seed production of tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) established under a barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) cover crop · 1993

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley sowing at 100, 150, and 200 kg/ha reduced tall fescue reproductive tiller numbers by an average of 145/m 2.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
barley sowing rates of 100, 150, and 200 kg/hae0
Outcome
reproductive tiller numberse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
145/m 2e0
Comparator
tall fescue sown alonee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At barley sowing rates of 100, 150, and 200 kg/ha, first‐year seed yields and reproductive tiller numbers of tall fescue were reduced by an average of 245 kg/ha and 145/m 2 respectively compared to tall fescue sown alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–526

Title

Seed production of tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) established under a barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) cover crop

M. D. Hare; J. M. De Ruiter New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 1993. doi:10.1080/00288233.1993.10417742

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-dacdb2bbc66faab2f8f032234d4a9fccf3ad9c29ffdf48329258617960096f93 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

density · yield · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. no effect
  8. no effect
See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.