Observationmodel-written summary

Laycot gave satisfactory results as a pollenizer for Goldrich.

A claim from Determination of suitable pollenizers for the apricot cultivar ‘Goldrich’ · 2018

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Laycot gave satisfactory results as a pollenizer for Goldrich.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Material
Laycote7
Outcome
Satisfactory resultse7

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apricot cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–62
e7

“Satisfactory results were given by ‘Pinkcot’ and ‘Laycot’, while ‘Aurora’ proved to be a bad pollenizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1509–1612

Title

Determination of suitable pollenizers for the apricot cultivar ‘Goldrich’

D. Milatović; N. Spasojević; D. Nikolić; et al. Acta Horticulturae 2018. doi:10.17660/actahortic.2018.1229.40

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-db06df0ef297183c9505969ebc8a1f3798ffbae27445dbba2a64dcb7f00eddb9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 17 in the model’s answer