Observationmodel-written summary

The number of pollen tubes was not significantly increased on the sixth day after pollination.

A claim from Determination of suitable pollenizers for the apricot cultivar ‘Goldrich’ · 2018

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of pollen tubes was not significantly increased on the sixth day after pollination.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Outcome
the number of pollen tubese6
Direction
was not significantly increasede6
Qualifier
on the sixth day after pollinatione6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apricot cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–62
e6

“on the sixth day after pollination, the number of pollen tubes was not significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1211

Title

Determination of suitable pollenizers for the apricot cultivar ‘Goldrich’

D. Milatović; N. Spasojević; D. Nikolić; et al. Acta Horticulturae 2018. doi:10.17660/actahortic.2018.1229.40

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-4f7be4235cd3da2df8ccab42e6e36bb373ace681a5b9870ff43683c95e1b6231 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer