Claim · model-written summary
Cymoxanil did not inhibit fungal growth on bark strips.
Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“cymoxanil did not inhibit the growth of fungus”
t0“Peach Tree”
Title
Effects of Metalaxyl, Fosetyl‐Al, Dimethomorph and Cymoxanil on Phytophthora cactorum of Peach Tree
T. Thomidis; K. Elena Journal of Phytopathology 2001. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0434.2001.00584.x
Other claims from this paper (15)
- Intervention effect Trunk-painted fosetyl‐Al inhibited fungal growth.
- Intervention effect Trunk-painted metalaxyl inhibited fungal growth.
- Intervention effect Dimethomorph trunk painting was ineffective.
- Intervention effect Cymoxanil trunk painting was ineffective.
- Intervention effect Metalaxyl soil drench suppressed canker development after inoculation.
- Intervention effect Fosetyl‐Al significantly reduced fungal growth versus cymoxanil, dimethomorph and control.
- Intervention effect Fosetyl‐Al was less effective than metalaxyl.
- Intervention effect Dimethomorph did not influence canker development.
- Intervention effect Cymoxanil did not influence canker development.
- Observation Metalaxyl remained active at least 21 days.
- Observation Fosetyl‐Al remained active at least 21 days.
- Intervention effect Metalaxyl was the most effective fungicide in bark strips.
- Intervention effect Fosetyl‐Al significantly reduced fungal development versus other agents and untreated strips.
- Intervention effect Dimethomorph significantly reduced strip colonization versus untreated strips.
- Recommendation The authors recommend metalaxyl trunk painting to prevent peach Phytophthora rot.