Intervention effectmodel-written summary

NDVI (0.619) was higher under alternate wetting and drying than under the other irrigation methods, followed by farmers practice.

A claim from Influence of different establishment methods and irrigation management on physiological and yield parameters in rice (Oryza sativa L.) · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NDVI (0.619) was higher under alternate wetting and drying than under the other irrigation methods, followed by farmers practice.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativat0
Treatment
AWDe0
Outcome
NDVI valuese0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.619e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Oryza sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–133
e0

“Among irrigation methods NDVI values (0.619), photosynthetic rate (22.39), chlorophyll content (3.67), were higher in AWD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1222

Title

Influence of different establishment methods and irrigation management on physiological and yield parameters in rice (Oryza sativa L.)

S.A. Veeresh; A Amaregouda; Umesh; et al. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2018

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-dbd8bebf4c0d2a936d8d2537e98330877ce9b4fc320b769899c6a92054a0119e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 222 positive, 69 negative or no effect

221 papers in the same direction as this claim · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

282 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.