Claim · model-written summary
The mixture had maximum groundnut benefit: cost ratio of 1.8, above twice hand weeding at 1.4.
- Taxon
- groundnut
Arachis hypogaeae4 - Treatment
- imazethapyr at lower rate 100 g a.i/ha with chlorimuron 24 g a.i/hae3
- Outcome
- benefit: cost ratioe0
- Direction
- maximume2
- Value
- 1.8e0
- Qualifier
- 1.4e1
- Comparator
- hand weeding twicee1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“benefit: cost ratio (1.8)”
e1“hand weeding twice which recorded the inferior values of NMR (10194.75/ha) and B: C ratio (1.4)”
e2“maximum values of net monetary returns (14096/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (1.8)”
e3“combined application of imazethapyr at lower rate 100 g a.i/ha with chlorimuron 24 g a.i/ha”
e4“weeds in groundnut”
Title
Smita Singh; M.L. Kewat; Megha Dubey; et al. Legume Research - An International Journal 2014. doi:10.5958/j.0976-0571.37.1.013
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect Imazethapyr at 50 g a.i/ha had poor efficacy against weeds in groundnut.
- Intervention effect Increasing imazethapyr rates from 150 to 300 g a.i/ha slightly significantly improved weed control in groundnut.
- Intervention effect The imazethapyr–chlorimuron mixture suppressed groundnut weed growth by 98.12%, near the 98.62% under twice hand weeding.
- Intervention effect The mixture produced 13.51 pods per groundnut plant, superior to other treatments.
- Intervention effect The mixture gave groundnut pod yield of 12.83 q/ha, above other treatments.
- Intervention effect The mixture gave groundnut haulm yield of 21.22 q/ha, above other treatments.
- Intervention effect The mixture had maximum groundnut net monetary returns of 14096/ha, above twice hand weeding at 10194.75/ha.