Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Ground-level cuts showed significant dry matter responses of kikuyu grass and ryegrass to gibberellic acid, smaller than the visual responses.

A claim from Cool‐season growth responses of kikuyu grass and ryegrass to gibberellic acid · 1980

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ground-level cuts showed significant dry matter responses of kikuyu grass and ryegrass to gibberellic acid, smaller than the visual responses.

Taxon
kikuyu grass and ryegrassLoliumCenchrus flacciduse2
Treatment
gibberellic acide2
Outcome
dry matter responsese2
Direction
smallere2
Comparator
visual responsese2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cenchrus flaccidus
Cenchrus flaccidus · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Ground level cuts showed significant dry matter responses of both kikuyu grass and ryegrass to gibberellic acid, but they were smaller than the visual responses indicated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–373

Title

Cool‐season growth responses of kikuyu grass and ryegrass to gibberellic acid

N. S. Percival New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 1980. doi:10.1080/00288233.1980.10417851

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-ddd8e2beee5a8825d0f0c4a1423f075362b3d0c9ae1c90ea00453a81b1fe515a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Gibberellic acid · growth · Cenchrus flaccidus (kikuyugrass)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Gibberellic acid · growth · LoliumResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.