Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Soil applied FeSO4 at 100 kg sulphur per hectare with STCR fertilization gave maximum cane nutrient contents.

A claim from Influence of Sulphur Fertilization on Yield, Nutrient Content and Uptake by Sugarcane in Sulphur Deficient soil of Thiruppuvanam Block of Sivagangai District · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil applied FeSO4 at 100 kg sulphur per hectare with STCR fertilization gave maximum cane nutrient contents.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
cane, leafe0
Treatment
sulphur @ 100 kg ha-1 as FeSO4 as soil application along with application of N, P2O5 and K2O on Soil Test Crop Response (STCR) basise0
Outcome
nutrient content of N, P, K & S in cane, leafe0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“application of sulphur @ 100 kg ha-1 as FeSO4 as soil application along with application of N, P2O5 and K2O on Soil Test Crop Response (STCR) basis registered the maximum nutrient content of N, P, K & S in cane, leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–494
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–85

Title

Influence of Sulphur Fertilization on Yield, Nutrient Content and Uptake by Sugarcane in Sulphur Deficient soil of Thiruppuvanam Block of Sivagangai District

R. Raghunath; P. Saravana Pandian; P. P. Mahendran; et al. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology 2021. doi:10.9734/cjast/2021/v40i1631422

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-ddfa8abc74773c87b4d2c457dc7dd2bbb9cf9998f344a926e8b1739a5bb3b1a4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

sulfur atom · nutrient: content · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

3 of 5 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.