Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In 2013, weed biomass was lower in canola preceded by other crops than in most continuous canola treatments.

A claim from Canola cultivar mixtures and rotations do not mitigate the negative impacts of continuous canola · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2013, weed biomass was lower in canola preceded by other crops than in most continuous canola treatments.

Treatment
canola preceded by other cropse2
Interactor
weede2weed
Outcome
weed biomasse2
Direction
lowere2
Comparator
most continuous canola treatmentse2
Setting
In 2013e2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Canola cultivar mixtures and rotations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–38
e2

“In 2013, weed biomass was lower in canola preceded by other crops than most continuous canola treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1300

Title

Canola cultivar mixtures and rotations do not mitigate the negative impacts of continuous canola

K. N. Harker; J. T. O'Donovan; T. K. Turkington; et al. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 2015. doi:10.4141/cjps-2015-126

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-df73e20be06b5fa59a09d31c4eb6669e7182f998462f4618101447f1cae45c0e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Brassica napus var. napus · weed · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.