Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Without growth regulators, pollinated pistils did not develop pod initials.

A claim from Prospects of Using Cicer canariense for Chickpea Improvement · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without growth regulators, pollinated pistils did not develop pod initials.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
growth regulators were not appliede0
Outcome
development of pod initials was not observede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the pollinated pistils where growth regulators were not applied, development of pod initials was not observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1004
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–48

Title

Prospects of Using Cicer canariense for Chickpea Improvement

Mallikarjuna N. Nadagouda 2001

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-dfd3fa0dcaf3b40b787e90d1e9acf81b739abfb42e57ce3a30957e2d7774f3d7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

class · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.