Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fertilizer treatment improved soluble solid content in watermelon or its soil.

A claim from Promoting plant yield and quality improvement in saline alkali land by using biomass organic fertilizer and reducing chemical fertilizer measures · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer treatment improved soluble solid content in watermelon or its soil.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse1
Treatment
biomass organic fertilizere0
Outcome
soluble solid contente0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
conventional fertilizer treatmente0
Setting
saline alkali soile1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“watermelon treated with biomass organic fertilizer also performed better in terms of quality, including better fruit size, soluble solid content, and vitamin C content than conventional fertilizer treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1183
e1

“compares the growth, yield, and quality of watermelon in saline alkali soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–616
e2

“applying organic biomass fertilizer and weight loss in saline alkali land”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1284

Title

Promoting plant yield and quality improvement in saline alkali land by using biomass organic fertilizer and reducing chemical fertilizer measures

Jun Zhao; Qiaoxian Zhang BMC Plant Biology 2025. doi:10.1186/s12870-025-07586-4

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e05a4f6aed4afa99b3e2dc5c8fb2d6aa4614c5e94f228b754f7322a2c11aa217 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.