Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Elevated carbon dioxide peanut foliage lowered S. litura efficiency of conversion of digested food.

A claim from Impact of Elevated CO2on Tobacco Caterpillar,Spodoptera lituraon Peanut,Arachis hypogea · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated carbon dioxide peanut foliage lowered S. litura efficiency of conversion of digested food.

Treatment
elevated CO(2)e1
Interactor
S. lituraSpodoptera liturae2pest
Outcome
efficiency of conversion of digested foode1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peanut (Arachis hypogea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–290
e1

“Decreased efficiency of conversion of ingested food, decreased efficiency of conversion of digested food, and decreased relative growth rate of larvae was observed under elevated CO(2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1315
e2

“longer larval duration, higher larval weights, and increased consumption of peanut foliage by S. litura larvae under elevated CO(2) compared with ambient CO(2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–967

Title

Impact of Elevated CO2on Tobacco Caterpillar,Spodoptera lituraon Peanut,Arachis hypogea

M Srinivasa Rao; D Manimanjari; M Vanaja; et al. Journal of insect science/Journal of Insect Science 2012. doi:10.1673/031.012.10301

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e063d2ed4b896fa0a41504a7454efa69f51d752bde2de603029524dde2277606 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

co2 · Spodoptera litura · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.