Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Tebuconazole spraying increased ratoon cane yield relative to other treatments.

A claim from Field evaluation of fungicides for the management of whip smut in sugarcane caused by Sporisorium scitamineum · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tebuconazole spraying increased ratoon cane yield relative to other treatments.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
spraying with tebuconazole @0.1%e0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“spraying with tebuconazole @0.1% or trifloxystrobin+tebuconaole @0.1% was found effective against whip smut disease with less disease incidence and higher cane yield compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1309
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–75

Title

Field evaluation of fungicides for the management of whip smut in sugarcane caused by Sporisorium scitamineum

Kishore Varma P; Chandrasekhar V; Bharathalakshmi M; et al. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2020. doi:10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i4c.9693

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e0ac075b1cbbb9c50bc7fa45bcc9c4b6ac82b2f7fb9dd91f9688fb9a3f605ba3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

tebuconazole · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 65 positive, 7 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. positive

63 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.