Intervention effectmodel-written summary

After 10 years, grain yields were 7.5 to 8.6% higher under no-till when stover was removed compared with no stover removal.

A claim from Tillage and Residue Management Effects on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Under Irrigated Continuous Corn · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 10 years, grain yields were 7.5 to 8.6% higher under no-till when stover was removed compared with no stover removal.

Treatment
NT when stover was removede1
Outcome
grain yieldse1
Direction
highere1
Value
7.5 to 8.6%e1
Comparator
no stover removale1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Irrigated Continuous Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–98
e1

“mean grain yields were 7.5 to 8.6% higher for NT when stover was removed compared with no stover removal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–768

Title

Tillage and Residue Management Effects on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Under Irrigated Continuous Corn

M.R. Schmer; V.L. Jin; B.J. Wienhold; et al. Soil Science Society of America Journal 2014. doi:10.2136/sssaj2014.04.0166

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-e0b99a79710376f42c30763692a1f5f931b409025a17b202800072440b7f1d56 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this claim · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.