Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Spring maize yield did not differ significantly between fertilization treatments.

A claim from Effects of single basal fertilization on yield and nutrient use efficiencies of spring maize in the Middle Reaches of Yangtze River · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Taxon: spring maizeZea mayse0
Treatment: single basal fertilization treatmente0
Outcome: yield differencee0
Comparator: conventional fertilization treatmente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

*Zea mays* · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0
“the yield difference of spring maize between the single basal fertilization treatment and the conventional fertilization treatment is not significant”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–374

Title

Effects of single basal fertilization on yield and nutrient use efficiencies of spring maize in the Middle Reaches of Yangtze River

Jun Ge; Moa Key 2013

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect Single basal fertilization increased economic benefit to 1429-1725 Yuan/ha.
Intervention effect Single fertilization significantly decreased pre-anthesis dry matter accumulation.
Intervention effect Single fertilization increased post-anthesis dry matter accumulation rate.
Intervention effect Total dry matter accumulation did not significantly differ between treatments.
Intervention effect Post-anthesis dry matter contribution did not significantly differ between treatments.
Intervention effect Single fertilization significantly decreased N, P and K accumulation before jointing.
Intervention effect N, P and K accumulation at maturity did not differ significantly between treatments.
Intervention effect Nutrient accumulation rate increased in the middle and later stages under single fertilization.
Intervention effect N translocation amount did not significantly differ between treatments.
Intervention effect N translocation efficiency did not significantly differ between treatments.
Intervention effect N use efficiency did not significantly differ between treatments.
Intervention effect Single fertilization had no effect on P and K accumulation or translocation during growth.
Intervention effect P and K use efficiencies increased under single fertilization as input decreased.

Record rev-e0d37e2b6b9c49e2192897bd80c2a5aad3081a28ba0189cab93876721f0abf37 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

423 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3,484 reporting no difference from an alternative

positive
Compared with SSB, one-time RZF increased grain yield by 4%.
Optimal Nitrogen Application Rates of One-Time Root Zone Fertilization and the Effect of Reducing Nitrogen Application on Summer Maize · 2019 · compared with SSB
No difference from an alternativeCites this paper
positive
Manure or compost application increased corn grain yield in all 4 years compared with the unfertilized check.
Phosphorus‐ and Nitrogen‐Based Manure and Compost Applications Corn Production and Soil Phosphorus · 1999 · compared with unfertilized check
No difference from an alternative
positive
Modest fertilizer intensification doubled grain yield relative to monoculture maize.
Biodiversity can support a greener revolution in Africa · 2010 · compared with monoculture maize
No difference from an alternative
positive
Satellite-based measures detected positive maize yield responses to fertilizer and hybrid seed inputs.
Satellite-based assessment of yield variation and its determinants in smallholder African systems · 2017
No difference from an alternative
positive
MNR organic maize yielded 137% of conventional maize in 1999.
The performance of organic and conventional cropping systems in an extreme climate year · 2003 · compared with CNV
No difference from an alternative
positive
N fertilizers raised maize yield 84% over control.
Does the combined application of organic and mineral nutrient sources influence maize productivity? A meta-analysis · 2010 · compared with control
No difference from an alternative
positive
Equal substitution of chemical fertilizer with cow manure or chicken manure increased spring maize production.
Effects of equal chemical fertilizer substitutions with organic manure on yield, dry matter, and nitrogen uptake of spring maize and soil nitrogen distribution · 2019 · compared with chemical fertilizer treatments
No difference from an alternative
positive
Fertilizer alongside organic manures substantially improved maize growth and yield.
Effects of organic and inorganic manures on maize and their residual impact on soil physico-chemical properties · 2017
No difference from an alternative

3,899 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.

Other papers on the same question

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results