Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Post-anthesis dry matter contribution did not significantly differ between treatments.

A claim from Effects of single basal fertilization on yield and nutrient use efficiencies of spring maize in the Middle Reaches of Yangtze River · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-anthesis dry matter contribution did not significantly differ between treatments.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
single fertilization treatmentt1
Outcome
contribution of the dry matters after the anthesise0
Comparator
conventional fertilization treatmentt1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“contribution of the dry matters after the anthesis are not significantly different between the two treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–886
t0

“spring maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–92
t1

“Compared with the conventional fertilization treatment,the amount of dry matter accumulation before the anthesis is significantly decreased under the single fertilization treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–660

Title

Effects of single basal fertilization on yield and nutrient use efficiencies of spring maize in the Middle Reaches of Yangtze River

Jun Ge; Moa Key 2013

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-e2c0b7e800c6896438d2fdb7049d2336a5a9966bac519e28d48e3620718be466 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

fertilization · phenology · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 45 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.