Claim · model-written summary
Post-anthesis dry matter contribution did not significantly differ between treatments.
- Treatment
- single fertilization treatmentt1
- Outcome
- contribution of the dry matters after the anthesise0
- Comparator
- conventional fertilization treatmentt1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“contribution of the dry matters after the anthesis are not significantly different between the two treatments”
t0“spring maize”
t1“Compared with the conventional fertilization treatment,the amount of dry matter accumulation before the anthesis is significantly decreased under the single fertilization treatment”
Title
Jun Ge; Moa Key 2013
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Intervention effect Spring maize yield did not differ significantly between fertilization treatments.
- Intervention effect Single basal fertilization increased economic benefit to 1429-1725 Yuan/ha.
- Intervention effect Single fertilization significantly decreased pre-anthesis dry matter accumulation.
- Intervention effect Single fertilization increased post-anthesis dry matter accumulation rate.
- Intervention effect Total dry matter accumulation did not significantly differ between treatments.
- Intervention effect Single fertilization significantly decreased N, P and K accumulation before jointing.
- Intervention effect N, P and K accumulation at maturity did not differ significantly between treatments.
- Intervention effect Nutrient accumulation rate increased in the middle and later stages under single fertilization.
- Intervention effect N translocation amount did not significantly differ between treatments.
- Intervention effect N translocation efficiency did not significantly differ between treatments.
- Intervention effect N use efficiency did not significantly differ between treatments.
- Intervention effect Single fertilization had no effect on P and K accumulation or translocation during growth.
- Intervention effect P and K use efficiencies increased under single fertilization as input decreased.