Intervention effectmodel-written summary

ARHS/Mn 3 showed maximum growth promotion of Vigna radiata in vivo.

A claim from Evaluation of streptomyces and non-streptomyces actinomycetes isolates for growth promotion in Vigna radiata and their use as biocontrol agent against Sclerotium rolfsii · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ARHS/Mn 3 showed maximum growth promotion of Vigna radiata in vivo.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatae3
Treatment
ARHS/Mn 3e3
Interactor
ARHS/Mn 3e3symbiont
Outcome
growth promotione3
Direction
maximume3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“In vivo evaluation of the isolates ARHS/Mn 3, Streptomyces griseolus (ARHS/PO27) and Streptomyces griseus (ARHS/PO26) showed maximum growth promotion on Vigna radiata by enhancing key defense enzymes like chitinase, β-1,3-glucanase, phenylalanine ammonia lyase and peroxidase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–905

Title

Evaluation of streptomyces and non-streptomyces actinomycetes isolates for growth promotion in Vigna radiata and their use as biocontrol agent against Sclerotium rolfsii

Puspanjali Ray; Arka Pratim Chakraborty; Biswanath Chakraborty NBU Journal of Plant Sciences 2016. doi:10.55734/nbujps.2016.v10i01.008

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e0de331034ef44bc22e733f320ecc71f15e6517dcc879905bce01ebfe68cfb0f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

manganese atom · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.