Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Streptomyces griseolus (ARHS/PO27) inhibited growth of Sclerotium rolfsii by 59.7% in vitro.

A claim from Evaluation of streptomyces and non-streptomyces actinomycetes isolates for growth promotion in Vigna radiata and their use as biocontrol agent against Sclerotium rolfsii · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Streptomyces griseolus (ARHS/PO27) inhibited growth of Sclerotium rolfsii by 59.7% in vitro.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatae3
Treatment
Streptomyces griseolus (ARHS/PO27)e2
Interactor
Sclerotium rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie2pathogen
Second interactor
Streptomyces griseolus (ARHS/PO27)Streptomyces griseoluse2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth of Sclerotium rolfsiie2
Direction
inhibite2
Value
59.7%e2
Setting
in vitroe2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agroathelia rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsii · InteractorEdward L. Barnard - Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“ARHS/Mn 3 and Streptomyces griseolus (ARHS/PO27) could inhibit 68% and 59.7% growth of Sclerotium rolfsii in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–628
e3

“In vivo evaluation of the isolates ARHS/Mn 3, Streptomyces griseolus (ARHS/PO27) and Streptomyces griseus (ARHS/PO26) showed maximum growth promotion on Vigna radiata by enhancing key defense enzymes like chitinase, β-1,3-glucanase, phenylalanine ammonia lyase and peroxidase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–905

Title

Evaluation of streptomyces and non-streptomyces actinomycetes isolates for growth promotion in Vigna radiata and their use as biocontrol agent against Sclerotium rolfsii

Puspanjali Ray; Arka Pratim Chakraborty; Biswanath Chakraborty NBU Journal of Plant Sciences 2016. doi:10.55734/nbujps.2016.v10i01.008

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e77bb53331f1dc465c910abde73e094f54639f7213174ae5f217f961f1c6fc68 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer