Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Ridge and furrow increased grain yield by 22.21 per cent over flat sowing.

A claim from Effect of soil moisture conservation practices and seed hardening on growth, yield, nutrient content, uptake and quality of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge and furrow increased grain yield by 22.21 per cent over flat sowing.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
ridge and furrowe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
22.21e0
Comparator
flat sowinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ridge and furrow, plastic mulch and pre sowing seed hardening with KNO3 enhanced grain yield to the tune of 22.21, 14.40 and 48.82 and 10.50 per cent over flat sowing, straw and dust mulch and without seed hardening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–920
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–136

Title

Effect of soil moisture conservation practices and seed hardening on growth, yield, nutrient content, uptake and quality of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.]

Sushila Kanwar; Versha Gupta; PS Rathore; et al. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2017

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e106e9c563e45e3f20efefe674ca2e77943663431881fdf3a05cf759ccc8801f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 34 positive, 6 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.