Paper · 2015

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PRODUCTION FACTORS ON PRODUCTIVITY, NPK UPTAKE AND QUALITY OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.)

Arun Kumar; Anil Kumar; L. K. Midha; et al.

20
claims
48
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY The experiment was conducted at Hisar during kharif season of 2011 with an objective to see the effect of different production factors on the NPK content and their uptake as well as quality of pearl millet in terms of protein content. Eight different treatments i. e. T 1 –Full package of practices [RDF (125 kg N+62.5 kg P 2 O 5 /ha)+ZnSO 4 @ 25 kg/ha+biofertilizer biomix (Azospirillum+PSB)+thinning and gap filling+weeding and hoeing (20 and 35 DAS)+irrigation], T 2 : T 1 –RDF (N and P), T 3 : T 1 –ZnSO 4 @ 25 kg/ha, T 4 : T 1 –Biomix, T 5 : T 1 –Thinning and gap filling (19 DAS), T 6 : T 1 –Weeding and hoeing (20 and 35 DAS), T 7 : T 1 –Irrigation and T 8 : Control were laid out in randomized block design with three replications. Nonadoption of individual factors recommended dose of fertilizer (T 2 ), ZnSO 4 (T 3 ), biomix (T 4 ), thinning and gap filling (T 5 ), weeding and hoeing (T 6 ) and irrigation (T 7 ) caused a decrease in grain yield by 32.8, 12.2, 7.7, 16.7, 30.1, 20.2 and 48.0 (control), per cent and stover yield by 22.7, 7.9, 4.0, 10.0, 18.9, 16.0 and 32.2 per cent (control) than T 1 (FPP), respectively. Among all the treatments, T 1 recorded significantly higher N, P, K and protein contents and their uptake in grain as well as in stover. Nitrogen content in grain increased significantly from 1.66 per cent under control (T 8 ) to 1.84 per cent in T 1 and followed by T 4 (1.82%), T 3 (1.82%) and T 5 (1.79%). The phosphorus content also increased from 0.24 per cent (T 8 ) to 0.31 per cent (T 1 ) in grain, whereas potassium content in grain was lowest under T 8 (0.53%) and highest under T 1 (0.60%) treatment. The total N, P and K uptake was found highest in T 1 (129.78, 26.47 and 308.77 kg/ha, respectively). The protein content in grain also significantly increased from 10.4 per cent (T 8 ) to 11.5 per cent in T 1 and followed by T 4 (11.4%) and T 3 (11.3%) treatments. The present study clearly indicated that non-adoption of individual factors i. e. recommended dose of N & P and weeding and hoeing caused a maximum decrease in grain yield by 32.8 and 30.1 per cent and stover yield by 22.7 and 18.9 per cent than full package of practices, respectively. The adoption of full package of practices resulted in the higher N, P, K and content (%) and their uptake (kg/ha) in grain and stover.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting recommended fertilizer reduced grain yield 32.8% versus the full package.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
recommended dose of fertilizer (T 2 )e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
32.8e0
Comparator
T 1e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“recommended dose of fertilizer (T 2 ), ZnSO 4 (T 3 ), biomix (T 4 ), thinning and gap filling (T 5 ), weeding and hoeing (T 6 ) and irrigation (T 7 ) caused a decrease in grain yield by 32.8, 12.2, 7.7, 16.7, 30.1, 20.2 and 48.0 (control), per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“than T 1 (FPP), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting ZnSO4 reduced grain yield 12.2%.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
ZnSO 4 (T 3 )e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
12.2e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ZnSO 4 (T 3 ), biomix (T 4 ), thinning and gap filling (T 5 ), weeding and hoeing (T 6 ) and irrigation (T 7 ) caused a decrease in grain yield by 32.8, 12.2, 7.7, 16.7, 30.1, 20.2 and 48.0 (control), per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting biomix reduced grain yield 7.7%.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
biomix (T 4 )e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
7.7e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biomix (T 4 ), thinning and gap filling (T 5 ), weeding and hoeing (T 6 ) and irrigation (T 7 ) caused a decrease in grain yield by 32.8, 12.2, 7.7, 16.7, 30.1, 20.2 and 48.0 (control), per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting thinning and gap filling reduced grain yield 16.7%.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
thinning and gap filling (T 5 )e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
16.7e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thinning and gap filling (T 5 ), weeding and hoeing (T 6 ) and irrigation (T 7 ) caused a decrease in grain yield by 32.8, 12.2, 7.7, 16.7, 30.1, 20.2 and 48.0 (control), per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting weeding and hoeing reduced grain yield 30.1%.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
weeding and hoeing (T 6 )e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
30.1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weeding and hoeing (T 6 ) and irrigation (T 7 ) caused a decrease in grain yield by 32.8, 12.2, 7.7, 16.7, 30.1, 20.2 and 48.0 (control), per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting irrigation reduced grain yield 20.2%.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
irrigation (T 7 )e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
20.2e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation (T 7 ) caused a decrease in grain yield by 32.8, 12.2, 7.7, 16.7, 30.1, 20.2 and 48.0 (control), per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control grain yield was 48.0% below the full package.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
controle0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
48.0e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“caused a decrease in grain yield by 32.8, 12.2, 7.7, 16.7, 30.1, 20.2 and 48.0 (control), per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting fertilizer reduced stover yield 22.7%.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
recommended dose of fertilizere1
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
decreasee1
Value
22.7e0
Comparator
T 1 (FPP)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stover yield by 22.7, 7.9, 4.0, 10.0, 18.9, 16.0 and 32.2 per cent (control) than T 1 (FPP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nonadoption of individual factors recommended dose of fertilizer (T 2 ), ZnSO 4 (T 3 ), biomix (T 4 ), thinning and gap filling (T 5 ), weeding and hoeing (T 6 ) and irrigation (T 7 ) caused a decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–949 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting ZnSO4 reduced stover yield 7.9%.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
decreasee1
Value
7.9e0
Comparator
T 1 (FPP)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleTreatmentSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stover yield by 22.7, 7.9, 4.0, 10.0, 18.9, 16.0 and 32.2 per cent (control) than T 1 (FPP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“caused a decrease in grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting biomix reduced stover yield 4.0%.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
decreasee1
Value
4.0e0
Comparator
T 1 (FPP)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleTreatmentSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stover yield by 22.7, 7.9, 4.0, 10.0, 18.9, 16.0 and 32.2 per cent (control) than T 1 (FPP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“caused a decrease in grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting thinning reduced stover yield 10.0%.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
decreasee1
Value
10.0e0
Comparator
T 1 (FPP)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleTreatmentSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stover yield by 22.7, 7.9, 4.0, 10.0, 18.9, 16.0 and 32.2 per cent (control) than T 1 (FPP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“caused a decrease in grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting weeding reduced stover yield 18.9%.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
decreasee1
Value
18.9e0
Comparator
T 1 (FPP)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleTreatmentSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stover yield by 22.7, 7.9, 4.0, 10.0, 18.9, 16.0 and 32.2 per cent (control) than T 1 (FPP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“caused a decrease in grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting irrigation reduced stover yield 16.0%.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
decreasee1
Value
16.0e0
Comparator
T 1 (FPP)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleTreatmentSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stover yield by 22.7, 7.9, 4.0, 10.0, 18.9, 16.0 and 32.2 per cent (control) than T 1 (FPP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“caused a decrease in grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control stover yield was 32.2% below the full package.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
controle0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
decreasee1
Value
32.2 per cente0
Comparator
T 1 (FPP)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stover yield by 22.7, 7.9, 4.0, 10.0, 18.9, 16.0 and 32.2 per cent (control) than T 1 (FPP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“caused a decrease in grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Full package significantly increased N, P, K and protein contents and uptake in grain and stover.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
T 1e0
Outcome
N, P, K and protein contents and their uptakee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T 1 recorded significantly higher N, P, K and protein contents and their uptake in grain as well as in stover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1277 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain nitrogen content rose from 1.66% under control to 1.84% under T1.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
T 1e0
Outcome
Nitrogen content in graine0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.84 per cente0
Qualifier
1.66 per cente0
Comparator
control (T 8 )e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen content in grain increased significantly from 1.66 per cent under control (T 8 ) to 1.84 per cent in T 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1392 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain phosphorus content rose from 0.24% under control to 0.31% under T1.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
T 1e0
Outcome
phosphorus contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.31 per cente0
Qualifier
0.24 per cente0
Comparator
T 8e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“phosphorus content also increased from 0.24 per cent (T 8 ) to 0.31 per cent (T 1 ) in grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1547 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain potassium content was highest under T1 at 0.60% versus 0.53% under T8.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
T 1e0
Outcome
potassium content in graine0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.60%e0
Qualifier
0.53%e0
Comparator
T 8e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“potassium content in grain was lowest under T 8 (0.53%) and highest under T 1 (0.60%) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1557–1652 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full package yielded highest total N, P and K uptake at 129.78, 26.47 and 308.77 kg/ha.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
T 1e0
Outcome
total N, P and K uptakee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
129.78, 26.47 and 308.77 kg/hae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total N, P and K uptake was found highest in T 1 (129.78, 26.47 and 308.77 kg/ha, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1658–1753 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain protein content increased from 10.4% under control to 11.5% under T1.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
T 1e0
Outcome
protein content in graine0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.5 per cente0
Qualifier
10.4 per cente0
Comparator
T 8e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“protein content in grain also significantly increased from 10.4 per cent (T 8 ) to 11.5 per cent in T 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1759–1862 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–94 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 27 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

pruning · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

herbicide · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 34 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

irrigation · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 34 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

259 papers: 249 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 249 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

255 papers more in this group

See all 259 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.