Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Omitting recommended fertilizer reduced grain yield 32.8% versus the full package.

A claim from EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PRODUCTION FACTORS ON PRODUCTIVITY, NPK UPTAKE AND QUALITY OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.) · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting recommended fertilizer reduced grain yield 32.8% versus the full package.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
recommended dose of fertilizer (T 2 )e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
32.8e0
Comparator
T 1e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“recommended dose of fertilizer (T 2 ), ZnSO 4 (T 3 ), biomix (T 4 ), thinning and gap filling (T 5 ), weeding and hoeing (T 6 ) and irrigation (T 7 ) caused a decrease in grain yield by 32.8, 12.2, 7.7, 16.7, 30.1, 20.2 and 48.0 (control), per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–1030
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–94
e1

“than T 1 (FPP), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1140

Title

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PRODUCTION FACTORS ON PRODUCTIVITY, NPK UPTAKE AND QUALITY OF PEARL MILLET (PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R. BR.)

Arun Kumar; Anil Kumar; L. K. Midha; et al. 2015

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-b7ec17ec2c73bc96d9900dcf2e2325b257dd16b76da4cc724a4443fb0b68b8d4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

259 papers: 249 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 249 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

250 papers more in this group

See all 259 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.