Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Total ammonia volatilization under CRF and SCF was 51.34%-91.34% lower than under CCF.

A claim from [Effects of controlled-release fertilizers on summer maize grain yield, field ammonia volatilization, and fertilizer nitrogen use efficiency]. · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total ammonia volatilization under CRF and SCF was 51.34%-91.34% lower than under CCF.

Taxon
summer maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
CRF and SCFe5
Outcome
total amount of ammonia volatilizatione5
Direction
decremente5
Value
51.34%-91.34%e5
Comparator
CCFe5
Setting
field experimente1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A field experiment with colophony-coated fertilizer (CRF) and sulfur-coated fertilizer (SCF) showed that under the same application rates of N, P and K, applying CRF and SCF increased the summer maize grain yield by 13.15% and 14.15%, respectively, compared to the application of common compound fertilizer CCF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–310
e5

“the total amount of ammonia volatilization in treatments CRF and SCF was ranged from 0.78 kg N x hm(-2) to 4.43 kg N x hm(-2), with a decrement of 51.34%-91.34% compared to that in treatment CCF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–899

Title

[Effects of controlled-release fertilizers on summer maize grain yield, field ammonia volatilization, and fertilizer nitrogen use efficiency].

Bin Zhao; Shu-Ting Dong; Kong-Jun Wang; et al. PubMed 2009

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-e118168cb3d60fc18238cac1dbbce900717e5f23b9fb50ab97e9dedb158b14e5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

fertilization · environment: emissions · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

67 papers: 37 positive, 30 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this claim · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

58 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.