Observationmodel-written summary

Pea aphid datasets showed DD at least 75% in 11 of 39 cases.

A claim from Does Harvesting Affect the Spatio-Temporal Signature of Pests and Natural Enemies in Alfalfa Fields? · 2019

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea aphid datasets showed DD at least 75% in 11 of 39 cases.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Interactor
pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisumAcyrthosiphon pisume0pest
Outcome
DDe0
Value
11 out of 39e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Acyrthosiphon pisum
Acyrthosiphon pisum · InteractorShipher Wu (photograph) and Gee-way Lin (aphid provision), National Taiwan University · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Geostatistical analysis indicated that the degree of dependence (DD) was ≥75% for 11 out of 39, 9 out of 35, 3 out of 12, 10 out of 29, and 2 out of 20 datasets for pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum, spotted alfalfa aphid Therioaphis maculata, cowpea aphid Aphis craccivora, alfalfa plant bug Adelphocoris lineolatus, and tarnished plant bug Lygus rugulipennis, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–935
t0

“Alfalfa Fields?”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–100

Title

Does Harvesting Affect the Spatio-Temporal Signature of Pests and Natural Enemies in Alfalfa Fields?

Mahsa Ghahramani; Roghaiyeh Karimzadeh; Shahzad Iranipour; et al. Agronomy 2019. doi:10.3390/agronomy9090532

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-e13fb2eb1a17a495f83f981856823fa8fd33064bc15e79eccaed406d6a7e5b7e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer