Claim · model-written summary
Fall tillage by weed-management interaction was not significant for yield.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- fall tillage treatment × WMSe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The fall tillage treatment × WMS interaction was not significant for yield or net return”
t0“Soybean”
t1“Soybean”
Title
Larry G. Heatherly; Stan R. Spurlock; Krishna N. Reddy Agronomy Journal 2004. doi:10.2134/agronj2004.0742
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Redvine control declined with shallow tillage and non-GR cultivars.
- Observation The decline in redvine control did not cause a yield decline.
- Intervention effect Johnsongrass control averaged below 40% with non-GR cultivars.
- Intervention effect Johnsongrass control averaged above 93% with GR cultivars.
- Association The johnsongrass control difference was associated with lower yield.
- Intervention effect PRE plus POST management sometimes yielded lower profits than POST only.
- Association Fall tillage by weed-management interaction was not significant for net return.
- Recommendation The authors conclude deep tillage for perennial weed management is uneconomical.