Intervention effectmodel-written summary

PRE plus POST management sometimes yielded lower profits than POST only.

A claim from Weed Management in Nonirrigated Glyphosate‐Resistant and Non‐Resistant Soybean following Deep and Shallow Fall Tillage · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRE plus POST management sometimes yielded lower profits than POST only.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
PRE + POSTe0
Outcome
profitse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
POST‐only weed managemente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Use of PRE + POST vs. POST‐only weed management sometimes resulted in lower profits regardless of fall tillage treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1497
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–78
t1

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–78

Title

Weed Management in Nonirrigated Glyphosate‐Resistant and Non‐Resistant Soybean following Deep and Shallow Fall Tillage

Larry G. Heatherly; Stan R. Spurlock; Krishna N. Reddy Agronomy Journal 2004. doi:10.2134/agronj2004.0742

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-187b1992fbeb60c0e875de9662ee35a6689ee42a21b018c8624917bf716d4bf3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

herbicide · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

460 papers: 322 positive, 138 negative or no effect

137 papers in the same direction as this claim · 322 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

451 papers more in this group

See all 460 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.