Intervention effectmodel-written summary

POST‐only weed management gave greater net returns than PRE + POST weed management with both CONV and GR cultivars.

A claim from Weed Management Systems for Conventional and Glyphosate‐Resistant Soybean with and without Irrigation · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POST‐only weed management gave greater net returns than PRE + POST weed management with both CONV and GR cultivars.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Material
CONV and GR cultivarse1
Treatment
POST‐only weed managemente1
Outcome
net returnse1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
PRE + POST weed managemente1

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the early soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–114
e1

“Use of POST‐only weed management was cheaper, yielded more, and resulted in greater net returns than did use of PRE + POST weed management with both CONV and GR cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–990

Title

Weed Management Systems for Conventional and Glyphosate‐Resistant Soybean with and without Irrigation

Larry G. Heatherly; C. Dennis Elmore; Stan R. Spurlock Agronomy Journal 2002. doi:10.2134/agronj2002.1419

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-e6cb720b716f3a0fb30587ea00ca10aa5c82d6fa2f3955d5f3c942f653f810e4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

herbicide · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

460 papers: 322 positive, 138 negative or no effect

321 papers in the same direction as this claim · 112 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

451 papers more in this group

See all 460 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.