Claim · model-written summary
Benefit cost ratio was highest at 35 kg S ha -1 for both sulphur sources.
- Taxon
- onion
Allium cepat0 - Treatment
- 35 kg S ha -1e0
- Outcome
- benefit cost ratioe0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest net return and benefit cost ratio were achieved with the application of 35 kg S ha -1 in both the sources of sulphur”
t0“onion”
Title
B. R. Nayak; P. K. Samanta; N. Panigrahy; et al. International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management 2016. doi:10.23910/ijbsm/2016.7.1.1502
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect Onion plant height, bulb length and bulb diameter increased significantly through 35 kg S ha -1 and then declined.
- Intervention effect Onion neck length and mean bulb weight increased significantly through 35 kg S ha -1 and then declined.
- Intervention effect Bulb yield peaked at 35 kg sulphur per hectare and exceeded zero sulphur significantly.
- Intervention effect Bulb yield at 35 kg sulphur per hectare exceeded 20 kg S ha -1 significantly.
- Intervention effect Bulb yield at 35 kg sulphur per hectare was at par with 50 kg S ha -1.
- Intervention effect Gypsum at 35 kg S ha -1 produced 3.8 t ha -1 additional bulb yield over control.
- Intervention effect Gromorsulphur at 35 kg S ha -1 produced 5.4 t ha -1 additional bulb yield over control.
- Intervention effect Sulphur use efficiency rose to 35 kg S ha -1 and declined thereafter for both sources.
- Intervention effect Net return was highest at 35 kg S ha -1 for both sulphur sources.
- Intervention effect Gromorsulphur yielded higher onion growth and bulb yield than gypsum.
- Intervention effect Gromorsulphur yielded higher sulphur use efficiency and economics than gypsum.