Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Ca humate, B humate and humic acid treatments did not significantly change total soluble solids, fruit dry matter or chlorophyll of tomato and cucumber.

A claim from Growth, yield, and calcium and boron uptake of tomato(Lycopersicon esculentum L.) and cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) asaffected by calcium and boron humate application in greenhouse conditions · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ca humate, B humate and humic acid treatments did not significantly change total soluble solids, fruit dry matter or chlorophyll of tomato and cucumber.

Treatment
the treatmentse2
Outcome
total soluble solids, fruit dry matter, chlorophylle2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The results revealed that Ca humate, B humate, and humic acid treatments applied at different rates positively affected the total marketable yield, average fruit weight, fruit diameter, fruit length, and leaf dry matter of tomato and cucumber plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–799
e2

“However, no statistically significant differences were observed among the treatments in terms of total soluble solids, fruit dry matter, chlorophyll, and plant length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–967

Title

Growth, yield, and calcium and boron uptake of tomato(Lycopersicon esculentum L.) and cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) asaffected by calcium and boron humate application in greenhouse conditions

Melek EKİNCİ; Aslıhan ESRİNGÜ; Atilla DURSUN; et al. TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY 2015. doi:10.3906/tar-1406-59

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-e15b92703cb56dceda6573ddef8c2446909c95d25ca2694b6601c478325dda0e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 15 in the model’s answer