Claim · model-written summary
All extracts inhibited both pathogenic bacteria at a minimum inhibitory concentration of 6.25 mg/mL.
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Verbatim
e0“All extracts were effective against both types of pathogenic bacteria, with MIC and MBC of 6.25 mg/mL and 25 mg/mL, respectively.”
t0“Cajuput (Melaleuca cajuputi)”
Title
Sunanta Khongsai; Chakhriya Chalad; Preeda Phumee Tropical Journal of Natural Product Research 2024. doi:10.26538/tjnpr/v8i12.24
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Observation The aqueous leaf extract had higher total phenolic content than the ethanol extract.
- Observation The aqueous leaf extract had higher total flavonoid content than the ethanol extract.
- Observation The aqueous leaf extract had higher condensed tannin content than the ethanol extract.
- Observation The aqueous extract had greater DPPH radical scavenging activity than the ethanol extract, with an IC50 of 0.078 mg/mL.
- Observation The aqueous extract had greater ABTS radical scavenging activity than the ethanol extract, with an IC50 of 0.193 mg/mL.
- Observation The aqueous extract had a larger inhibition zone against Vibrio harveyi than the ethanol extract, measuring 7.94 mm.
- Observation The aqueous extract had a larger inhibition zone against Vibrio parahaemolyticus than the ethanol extract, measuring 7.65 mm.
- Observation All extracts were bactericidal against both pathogenic bacteria at 25 mg/mL.