Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zero tillage had the highest energy productivity of 1.33 kg/MJ.

A claim from Effect of tillage, planting method and residue management on energetics and economics of cowpea in the Indo-Gangetic plain of Eastern Uttar Pradesh · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage had the highest energy productivity of 1.33 kg/MJ.

Treatment
ZTe0
Outcome
energy productivitye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.33 kg/MJe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tillage had a significant effect on energy productivity and highest energy productivity of 1.33 kg/MJ was obtained under ZT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–844
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95

Title

Effect of tillage, planting method and residue management on energetics and economics of cowpea in the Indo-Gangetic plain of Eastern Uttar Pradesh

T.D. Lama; R. B. R. Yadava; Anant Bahadur; et al. Vegetable Science 2014

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-e185acc29392909cbd270fb3f8e48304fa996af2bf3bc3be5e63b35b9d400efd · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

35 papers: 27 positive, 8 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.