Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Salicylic priming significantly increased germination and seedling growth under chilling.

A claim from Enhancement in Seed Priming-Induced Starch Degradation of Rice Seed Under Chilling Stress via GA-Mediated α-Amylase Expression · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic priming significantly increased germination and seedling growth under chilling.

Treatment
SAe0
Outcome
seed germination and seedling growth attributese0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
chilling stresse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that both Se and SA priming significantly increased the seed germination and seedling growth attributes, and enhanced the starch degradation ability by increasing α-amylase activity and total soluble sugar content under chilling stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–1091
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–62

Title

Enhancement in Seed Priming-Induced Starch Degradation of Rice Seed Under Chilling Stress via GA-Mediated α-Amylase Expression

Lixiao Nie; Shaokun Song; Qi Yin; et al. Rice 2022. doi:10.1186/s12284-022-00567-3

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-e194a0c8a75f210623a6af161851e9af34decc64e63cff9385bc8fd987149787 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

salicylic acid · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

55 papers: 47 positive, 8 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

46 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.