Claim · model-written summary
Zn-CH was more effective than Zn-AA.
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Zn‐CH was more effective than Zn‐AA”
e1“maize ( Zea mays L.)”
Title
Mobility and Availability to Plants of Two Zinc Sources Applied to a Calcareous Soil
A. Obrador; J. Novillo; J. M. Alvarez Soil Science Society of America Journal 2003. doi:10.2136/sssaj2003.5640
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Observation Only Zn-CH produced detectable zinc in the most labile soil fraction.
- Observation A large portion of applied zinc occurred in the amorphous iron oxide bound fraction under all fertilizer treatments.
- Intervention effect Zn-CH increased zinc mobility relative to control and Zn-AA.
- Observation Forty-nine percent of applied Zn-CH leached from the column.
- Intervention effect Both zinc sources significantly increased maize dry matter yield compared with control.
- Intervention effect Increasing zinc dose did not further increase maize dry matter.
- Intervention effect Fertilizer treatments increased plant zinc concentration except at the lowest Zn-AA dose.
- Observation Plant zinc uptake differences between sources correlated with labile and DTPA-extractable soil zinc.