Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Ten to twenty percent extracts reduced weed chlorophyll content.

A claim from Bioherbicidal Activity and Metabolic Profiling of Potent Allelopathic Plant Fractions Against Major Weeds of Wheat—Way Forward to Lower the Risk of Synthetic Herbicides · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten to twenty percent extracts reduced weed chlorophyll content.

Treatment
10–20% methanolic extractse0
Outcome
chlorophyll content of weedse0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 10–20% methanolic extracts induced permanent wilting and substantial reduction in the chlorophyll content of weeds along with 20–80% increase in oxidative stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1389
t0

“Weeds of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–114

Title

Bioherbicidal Activity and Metabolic Profiling of Potent Allelopathic Plant Fractions Against Major Weeds of Wheat—Way Forward to Lower the Risk of Synthetic Herbicides

Sobia Anwar; Saadia Naseem; Saira Karimi; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2021. doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.632390

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e1e4c219b6287c5e5ea6f302ace794cecd5ca61e824afd6578b7a1413a61e915 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

botanical · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 31 positive, 16 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.