Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Weed leaf extracts reduced maize shoot length by up to 40%.

A claim from Weed-derived allelochemicals enhance maize performance through multidimensional modulation of growth and stress physiology · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed leaf extracts reduced maize shoot length by up to 40%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
aqueous leaf extractse1
Interactor
Amaranthus retroflexus, Parthenium hysterophorus, Alternanthera philoxeroides, Cynodon dactylon, and Trichodesma indicumCynodon dactylonAmaranthus retroflexusParthenium hysterophorusAlternanthera philoxeroidesTrichodesma indicume1weed
Outcome
shoote3
Direction
reducede3
Value
40%e3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · InteractorRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus retroflexus
Amaranthus retroflexus · InteractorLynk media · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Parthenium hysterophorus
Parthenium hysterophorus · InteractorEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on maize (Zea mays L.) under field-relevant conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–423
e1

“aqueous leaf extracts from five common weed species (Amaranthus retroflexus, Parthenium hysterophorus, Alternanthera philoxeroides, Cynodon dactylon, and Trichodesma indicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–368
e3

“while shoot and root lengths were reduced by up to 40% and 50%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–759

Title

Weed-derived allelochemicals enhance maize performance through multidimensional modulation of growth and stress physiology

Mukul Machhindra Barwant; Tejasvi Chavan; Mojtaba Kordrostami; et al. Scientific Reports 2026. doi:10.1038/s41598-026-54476-2

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-e1f27887ef005a9bdc420a10f55c5b8cad24824ccc0246b674b24f7a6f8e0a79 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

botanical · Amaranthus retroflexus · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

botanical · Parthenium hysterophorus · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.