Claim · model-written summary
Omitting weed management raised weed density and dry weight.
- Taxon
- groundnut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- non-adoption of weed managemente0
- Interactor
- weedse0weed
- Outcome
- density and dry weight of weedse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- full package of practicese0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“higher density and dry weight of weeds was recorded with non-adoption of weed management from full package of practices”
t0“groundnut”
Title
Research on Crops 2021. doi:10.31830/2348-7542.2021.135
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect The full package gave the lowest weed density and dry weight.
- Intervention effect The full package gave the lowest leaf miner incidence at 5 and 10 days after spraying.
- Intervention effect The full package gave higher pod, kernel and oil yield.
- Intervention effect Omitting nutrient management reduced yield by 35%.
- Intervention effect Omitting weed management reduced yield by 27%.
- Intervention effect Omitting in-situ moisture conservation reduced yield by 21%.
- Intervention effect Improved cultivar alone gave the lowest pod, kernel and oil yield.
- Observation The full package gave gross returns of Rs. 95902/ ha.
- Observation The full package gave net returns of Rs. 56942/ ha.
- Observation The full package gave a benefit cost ratio of 2.46.