Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Drip irrigation at 80% ET gave higher tomato fruit yield than surface irrigation.

A claim from Drip irrigation and black polyethylene mulch influence on growth, yield and water-use efficiency of tomato · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation at 80% ET gave higher tomato fruit yield than surface irrigation.

Treatment
Drip irrigation at 80% evapo-transpiration (ET)e0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
45.57 tonnes/hae0
Qualifier
29.43 tonnes/hae0
Comparator
surface irrigatione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drip irrigation at 80% evapo-transpiration (ET) crop based on pan evaporation applied gave significantly higher fruit yield (45.57 tonnes/ha) compared with the surface irrigation (29.43 tonnes/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–490
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–106

Title

Drip irrigation and black polyethylene mulch influence on growth, yield and water-use efficiency of tomato

Rajbir Singh; Satyendra Kumar; Dhananjay D. Nangare; et al. African Journal of Agricultural Research 2009. doi:10.5897/ajar.9000181

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-e2418573406f7cff30e6263ceba36a578cbd9f8a808650d52b05e71e463cf4f8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

344 papers: 239 positive, 105 negative or no effect

238 papers in the same direction as this claim · 98 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

335 papers more in this group

See all 344 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.